A PROTOTYPE ITEM-LEVEL INDEX
          TO THE CIVIL WAR PHOTOGRAPH COLLECTION
          OF THE OHIO HISTORICAL SOCIETY

          A Master's Research Paper submitted to the
          Kent State University School of Library and Information Science
          in partial fulfillment of the requirements
          for the degree Master of Library Science

          by

          Eric T. Davis

          Advisor:
          Dr. Marcia Lei Zeng

          August, 1997

          Historically, bibliographical classification and indexing systems have concentrated on textually-based materials. More recently, archives and libraries have realized a pressing need to provide intellectual and physical access to visual documents. An institution like the Ohio Historical Society must consider many different tools of access to achieve this goal. The growth of the Internet makes it an attractive conduit for providing access via an electronic index of bibliographical surrogates of the collection. The heart of the index of the bibliographical record. If the search terms selected by the researcher do not match the terms selected by the indexer, the index is a failure. This study addressed methods of anticipating the language and needs of its future users by charting and analyzing past information requests. It also examined the different sources available for generating the controlled vocabulary and bibliographic record format for image collections. Finally, an electronic index was generated and tested by four Ohio Historical Society staff researchers. It was found that the majority of reference requests are very specific, the subject headings of the Library of Congress Thesaurus for Graphic Materials are the most appropriate for this collection, and the best model for the bibliographic record is the Library of Congress record. Several modifications of these records proved appropriate in the areas of field names and the level of specificity of subject headings.

          TABLE OF CONTENTS

          I. INTRODUCTION

          • Rationale for study
          • Definition of terms
          • Limitations of study

          II. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

          • Unique challenges to cataloging images
          • Index facets

          III. METHODOLOGY

          IV. RESULTS

          • Analysis of reference requests
          • Bibliographic record model
          • Summary

          CHAPTER V. TESTING AND SUBJECTS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH

          • Subjects for further research

          APPENDIX A: Civil War Reference Requests, July 1995 - May 1997

          • Appendix Aa: Non-Civil War Reference Requests, July 1995 - May 1997

          APPENDIX B: Information Only Requests, July 1995 - May 1997

          APPENDIX C: Sample Records

          APPENDIX D: Bibliography of Civil War Ohio Reference Books

          WORKS CITED


          Please send comments to:
          Eric T. Davis